None of the Iowa laws governing privacy notices and cookies grant any rulemaking or regulatory authority.
Consent pertaining to cookie usage is not necessarily required under the ICDPA; however, a mechanism to opt out of cookie usage may be required in the following circumstances (§715D.4 of the Iowa Code):
The controller must provide clear notice and opportunity to opt out of such activities (§715D.4(2) of the Iowa Code).
As detailed above, consent must be an affirmative act on the part of the consumer. Consent must be unambiguous, specific, freely given, and properly informed §715D.1(6) of the Iowa Code).
No consent is required for the processing of personal data only for the purpose of analyzing advertising performance, reach, or frequency.
The ICDPA does not apply to state political subdivisions; financial institutions, their affiliates, or data subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA); persons who already must abide by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009; non-profits; and institutions of higher education.
The ICDPA also exempts certain data, including (without limitation) the following (§715D.2(2) of the Iowa Code):
For a full list of exempt data, see §715D.2 of the Iowa Code.
While there are no explicit requirements for cookie-collected information, there are requirements stemming from the broader privacy protection scheme that could apply to cookies.
Under the ICDPA, a controller must provide clear notice and opportunity to opt out of the processing of the consumer's data prior to the processing of any sensitive data.
The privacy notice that the controller must provide to the consumer shall be clear, reasonably accessible, and meaningful, including the following information (§715D.4 of the Iowa Code):
There are no specific cookie consent mechanisms; however, the ICDPA requires certain activities that necessitate the use of cookies or similar tracking technologies to be clearly and conspicuously disclosed, detailing the manner in which the consumer may opt out, including a secure and reliable means for consumers to opt out, should they wish to do so (§715D,6 of the Iowa Code).
There are no specific requirements regarding cookie consent walls.
There is no specific duration for consent outlined; however, consent may be freely revoked at any given time.
There are no specific requirements for the placement of third-party cookies. However, the ICDPA and the Student Information Act impose requirements for the disclosure of what third-party cookies have been permitted to collect information. The ICDPA requires the controller, who permits the placement of third-party cookies, to provide a privacy notice detailing such information in a reasonably accessible, clear, and meaningful manner (§715D.6 of the Iowa Code). Included in this notice must be the categories of personal data that are shared with third parties, as well as the categories of third parties, if any, that the controller shares personal data with (§715D.6(d) of the Iowa Code). Additionally, the Student Information Act prohibits any form of engagement in targeted advertising on internet sites or applications for children in kindergarten through grade 12, which almost always includes cookie collection, retention, processing, and/or the sale of personal information collected from such cookies to and by third parties (§279.71(2)(a) of the Iowa Code).
The controller is not the only party required to safeguard the collected information and implement reasonable security measures under the ICDPA. The processor must enter into a contract with the controller, which ought to govern the processor's data processing procedures with respect to the processing done on behalf of the controller. The contract should set limits on what data is processed and the purpose of processing. Additionally, the processor must ensure that the personal data is handled with discretion and confidentiality (§715.D(5)(2) of the Iowa Code. The controller is not the only party required to safeguard the collected information and implement reasonable security measures under the ICDPA. The processor must enter into a contract with the controller, which ought to govern the processor's data processing procedures with respect to the processing done on behalf of the controller. The contract should set limits on what data is processed and the purpose of processing. Additionally, the processor must ensure that the personal data is handled with discretion and confidentiality (§715.D(5)(2) of the Iowa Code.
Iowa law incorporates no specific requirements for international data transfers.
There are no cookie-specific requirements for retention. However, the ICDPA contains provisions that dictate how any retained personal data ought to be maintained, which necessarily includes that collected by cookies and other similar technologies. According to the ICDPA, controllers, using reasonable measures, must protect the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of personal data (§715D.4(1) of the Iowa Code.
Both the ICDPA and the Student Information Act impose limitations on the extent to which personal data may be processed, which includes personal data collected via cookies and other similar tracking technologies. Under the ICDPA, personal data may only be processed to the extent that is reasonably necessary and proportionate to the purposes identified. The collected and processed personal data must be adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary for a specific purpose (§715D.7(6) of the Iowa Code. Under the Student Information Act, students' personal data, which constitutes covered information, may not be disclosed to a third party, except to subcontractors who need the information to provide the contracted services (§279.71.(4)(f) of the Iowa Code).
There have been no enforcement actions in Iowa to date. However, based on cases developing in other states that have already implemented privacy acts, there are two legal theories by which litigants are pursuing greater data collection and protection transparency that may impact Iowa in the near future.
There are cases pending in California state and federal district courts in which the argument is that cookies and similar technologies are merely internet versions of pen registers, and thus should fall within the wiretap laws of each jurisdiction. Should the federal courts find in favor of this argument, then it could support an argument that Iowa's Wiretap Law (§808B.2 of the Iowa Code) likewise extends to cookie usage. Cookie usage would be unlawful, unless operating under the color of law.
In a separate lawsuit, the plaintiffs have argued the tort intrusion upon seclusion should apply to personal data collection online, if the notices and opt-out mechanisms are found to be defective. Intrusion upon seclusion requires a false expectation of privacy and that breach of false expectation as highly offensive. It is unclear whether routine information collected online would be found to be highly offensive, but the first element of false expectation of privacy is likely to be satisfied. Should this be found to extend to online data collection, then consumers may have an additional private right of action.
There is no case law pertaining to the ICDPA yet in Iowa because the law will not be in effect until January 1, 2025. Additionally, neither the Student Information Act nor the Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act have any pertinent case law.
There is no private right of action for the ICDPA. The Iowa Attorney General (AG) retains enforcement powers for the ICDPA. The AG may seek an injunction to restrain any further violations of the ICDPA, as well as up to $7,500 fine per violation.
Under the Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds Act, a consumer may pursue a private right of action if they have suffered an ascertainable loss of money or property as a result of a violation of the act. The AG is permitted to intervene, as well; however, should the AG fail to intervene, they are not precluded from bringing a separate enforcement action.
Explore more and view Lee's expert profile on DataGuidance here. Special thanks to associate Katelyn Larossa for her assistance with this blog.